Runway choices#336

Can we getr an option to request a deifferent runway than the one assigned by BATC?

right now it just takes what you listed in simbrief as departure

In my experience it doesn’t use the simbrief one, but instead decides the active runways based on the weather in the simulator. It has never respected my runway choice from Simbrief

Same for me. It has even chosen a departure runway with 12kts tailwind. It doesn´t seems very “weather accurate” either. Of course it ignored what runway I´ve had chosen on simbrief.

This is a must have feature for me. Even the default MSFS allows change of runway

Agree. Thats a must have, ideal to be in next developments.

request different runway to departure or landing, different SID/STAR, request different approach such as ILS/Rnav, different gate for arrival is a MUST, all this can be done in FSHUD!

I’d honestly settle for using the real world ATIS, my biggest concern right now is simply that the way BEYOND ATC decides runways doesn’t reflect real world usage, because it’s internal logic isn’t consistent with the real world. It honestly can’t be, but using real world ATIS would help.

I suppose there is an issue with what to do when users customize the weather, so maybe a choice between real world and internal logic would be helpful

anyone facing like my place at WMKK airport? since BATC launch in May this year, they never assigned me to the opposite site of runway (Rwy 15), always stick to Rwy 33, either departure or land. lol.

Bought the product, and on the very first flight ATC assigned a runway different from the one in my SimBrief plan. I requested a change, but there was no other runway available in the selection menu. Same thing on landing — got cleared to land with a tailwind, and the request to change runway was denied.

I think fsHud is my next purchase.

I stopped uding beyond atc today. I’m so tired of getting tailwind takeoff and landings. This has got to be addressed. I recommend that anyone wanting batc wait until this is resolved. Over a year of complaints

they supposed to make like FSHUD does, you can asked any runaway to departure or landing, even on opposite direction, and up to ATC to allow it or not.

I’ve been using BATC for a while now and I keep turning it off because it keeps closing runways that does not match the live METAR. It’s frustrating. Right at the moment KSEA airplanes are landing on 16 and despite metar data the runway BATC is 34. I’m about to give up on using it.

Batc is junk